Thursday, 7 February 2013

Non acceptance and disagreement of minutes



J.C.A.
N F P E
ALL INDIA RMS & MMS EMPLOYEES UNION GR. ‘C’
ALL INDIS RMS & MMS MAIL GUARD & MTS GR. ‘C’
AIR MAIL SORTING DIVISION, MUMBAI-400 099

No.: AMSD/NFPE/TKS/Gr.C & Gr.D/Charter of Demand/13          Dt. 02-02-2013

To,

Shri. J. S. Patil
Sr. Supdt. of RMS,
AMSD, Mumbai – 400 099.

                  
Sub :  Non acceptance and disagreement of minutes.


Sir,

            The Meeting of our union office bearers of both Gr.C & Gr.D union held on 02/02/2013 has discussed and deliberated the contents of the Minutes of the meeting held on 01/02/2013 in response to our Charter of Demand and following opinion and decision was taken.
            While going through the minutes issued it is noticed that the actual discussions held in the meeting is not properly reflected in the minutes in some items but the union seems to be twisted while issuing the minutes
            We will like to bring the following incorrect noting/reply to the items in the minutes
(1)   The reply given for point 2- about providing faced articles is not correct
(2)   The reply given for point 3- of diversion of DO/HRO staff to mail office- to refer to circle office is improper as it is reverse gear thinking DG’s order referring to circle office hence not acceptable
(3)    Point 4- of restoration of manpower as per sanctioned strength of Division office/HRO AMSD immediately the reply given is improper. Hence not acceptable.
(4)   Point 5 & 6- are co-related with each other however administration is agreed on point 6 that pending weekly off’s should be cleared expeditiously meaning the reply given to point 5- is totally vague because your view to educate the staff to avoid abrupt absenteeism is totally contrast with point 6 hence your decision on the subject is unacceptable.

(5)    Point 9- it is fact that the Airlines required the mails 2 hours prior to flight scheduled departure hence if external agencies force us to adopt cut off time then why our department could not? Hence reply given is only providing half solution and not fulfills the requirement.
(6)   Point 10 the decision given on the issue was totally shocking as the matter was about threatening of disciplinary actions, suspensions, humiliation, sudden change of duties etc. and answer was improper and not at all satisfactory. The matter is about the threatening and humiliation, sudden change of duties of officials done by administrative officers and not about the gravity of the negligence or indiscipline of the officials to be taken into consideration. This reply given by Division Head is irrelevant to the point.
(7)    Point 20- answer given is not understandable.

Hence both the Gr.C & Gr.D union has come to the conclusion that the Division Administration has shown improper approach to the genuine problems and given decision was unjustified.  And issues are not settled properly hence the J.C.A has unanimously decided to continue with the Agitation programme as decided.
                                                           
                                       


Copy to:
1.   The Chief Postmaster General
Maharashtra Circle, Mumbai – 400 001.
2.   The Postmaster General (M.M.),Mumbai – 400 001.
3.   Circle Secretaries, Maharashtra Circle
4.   The General Secretaries Gr.C/MTS C.H.Q.N. Delhi.
5.    Sr. Police Inspector, Air Post Police Station, Mumbai – 400 099.
6.     Division Secretary of All recognized union, AMSD, Mumbai -99.
7.     Division Secretary- Tapal Kamgar Sena, AMSD, Mumbai- 99.
8.     Notice Board.